From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27239 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2010 13:56:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 27227 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Apr 2010 13:56:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:56:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1080B2BAB44; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:56:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id eyLnRpd0zO-c; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:56:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C6E2BAB6E; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:56:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 41007F5895; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:56:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:56:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, 'Pieter Maljaars' , "'Joseph S. Myers'" , 'Pedro Alves' Subject: Re: Question about solaris CANNOT_STEP_HW_WATCHPOINTS macro Message-ID: <20100422135635.GE13204@adacore.com> References: <001501cad820$36771f50$a3655df0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001501cad820$36771f50$a3655df0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00078.txt.bz2 > The macro CANNOT_STEP_HW_WATCHPOINTS [...] > If this bug has been solve before 2.9 version of Solaris, > would it be reasonable to just drop that code out? I think we should still support version 2.8 if we can. I'd be happy to do any testing with some of our machines running Solaris, but I need a reproducer that I can run by hand. I am still under strict orders to *NOT* run the dejagnu testsuite on our solaris machines, as it causes them to crash pretty badly :-(. -- Joel