From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-37268-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 12469 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2010 08:18:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 12451 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Apr 2010 08:18:42 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:18:37 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3M8IOBR009867; 	Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:18:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o3M8INMG014249; 	Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:18:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:18:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201004220818.o3M8INMG014249@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: daierxin@gmail.com
CC: gdb@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <w2v8f4584b51004211940jb2dbf91fv75d263cead64d0b8@mail.gmail.com> 	(message from =?GB2312?B?tPq2+9DA?= on Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:40:57 	+0800)
Subject: Re: No useful backtrace in core dump.
References:  <w2v8f4584b51004211940jb2dbf91fv75d263cead64d0b8@mail.gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:40:57 +0800
> From: =?GB2312?B?tPq2+9DA?= <daierxin@gmail.com>
> 
> Hi list,
>         I'm new with gdb. Really need your help. I run gdb with my
> program on ARM platform. I compiled the codes with -g option. After
> the codes crash, in core dump file, I only see something like:
> 
> Raise()
> Abort()
> ?? ()
> 
> Why no the last function called in my program? How to make this work,
> Please help.

Because GCC generates overoptimized code that destroys the call stack.
Please complain about this on the gcc mailing lists.