From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6509 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2010 14:12:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 6497 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2010 14:12:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:12:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090812BAB2E; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:12:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id y6CrELI8IExG; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:12:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66A32BAAD5; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:12:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8951BF5917; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:12:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:12:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Asm_gmail Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb-7.1 - last call before release (Wed, Mar 17th) Message-ID: <20100317141208.GJ3844@adacore.com> References: <20100316161124.GE3844@adacore.com> <4BA03709.6070702@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BA03709.6070702@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00102.txt.bz2 > But it seems the command interpreter is still a little slower than > the 7.0.1 version. As I have reported this issue in this maillist > before. > Sorry I can't compile it with -pg option. see here: > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2010-03/msg00029.html I don't think that this is a blocking issue, but I would possibly consider delaying the release while someone investigates. However, someone has to step up... Otherwise, I am afraid that we're just going to delay the release without a clear idea of how long the delay might be. I'm not going to start the process until later this afternoon (Pacific time). If someone steps up, then great, we can delay for a day or two to see what he finds. Otherwise, there's always going to be 7.1.1 or 7.2... -- Joel