From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26571 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2010 17:48:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 26561 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Mar 2010 17:48:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:48:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977812BAAF7; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:48:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 6G7nVtPRQsKu; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:48:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448232BABA9; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:48:13 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EC079F5894; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:47:53 +0400 (RET) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:48:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb-7.1 release preparation... Message-ID: <20100310174753.GR15364@adacore.com> References: <20100309181021.GI15364@adacore.com> <000301cac053$7a024c70$6e06e550$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000301cac053$7a024c70$6e06e550$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 02:13:28PM +0100, Pierre Muller wrote: > I recently found out a nasty bug in the pascal > expression support: > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-03/msg00314.html [...] > May I still commit this fix to the branch before release or is it too > late? Sure, please go ahead and commit on the branch. Actually, I should have suggested it too, I wasn't paying enough attention. -- Joel