From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, mcepl@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Licensing: gdb/osf-share/ is GPL-incompatible
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:20:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003101020.o2AAKQKm000277@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100310092425.GA3257@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (message from Jan Kratochvil on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:24:25 +0100)
> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:24:25 +0100
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> Matej Cepl has found gdb/osf-share/ contains "BSD with advertising" license:
>
> /*
> * (c) Copyright 1990-1996 OPEN SOFTWARE FOUNDATION, INC.
> * (c) Copyright 1990-1996 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
> * (c) Copyright 1990-1996 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
> * (c) Copyright 1991, 1992 Siemens-Nixdorf Information Systems
> * To anyone who acknowledges that this file is provided "AS IS" without
> * any express or implied warranty: permission to use, copy, modify, and
> * distribute this file for any purpose is hereby granted without fee,
> * provided that the above copyright notices and this notice appears in
> * all source code copies, and that none of the names listed above be used
> * in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software
> * without specific, written prior permission. None of these organizations
> * makes any representations about the suitability of this software for
> * any purpose.
> */
This is not the "obnoxious BSD advertising" clause. The "obnoxious
BSD advertising" clause requires you to mention the copyright owner in
all advertising materials mentioning the softwate. This copyright
notice requires you to do the opposite, i.e. not mention them at all.
> This code is GPL-incompatible according to:
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OriginalBSD
So whether the above is GPL incompatible is a whole different
question. I'd say it is perfectly compatible with at least the spirit
of the GPL. But since the lawayers got their paws on GPLv3, it turned
into completely incomprehensible gibberish and it is hard to tell.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-10 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-10 9:24 Jan Kratochvil
2010-03-10 10:20 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2010-03-10 10:53 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-03-10 14:24 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003101020.o2AAKQKm000277@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=mcepl@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox