Re: CORE_ADDR representation

Tom Tromey
2010-02-18T23:04:45Z

>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com> writes:

>> I would say to declare that CORE_ADDR is fundamentally 0..memtop, so
>> it should be unsigned and zero-extend.
>>
>> Can unsigned->signed->diddle->unsigned be encapsulated for MIPS only?

Daniel> I don't know that it can't. I think I discussed this with
Daniel> Andrew many years ago, and he thought that it couldn't; but I
Daniel> can't find the details...

Maybe this thread: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2002-09/threads.html#00078

Tom