From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31135 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2010 12:27:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 31127 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Feb 2010 12:27:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:27:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D782BAC34; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:27:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id xl8kTwsYKQ77; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:27:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3552BABE8; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:27:29 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E1BF1F59AE; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:27:19 +0400 (RET) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:27:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [gdb-7.1] new branching dates... Message-ID: <20100212122719.GS2919@adacore.com> References: <20100212054303.GE10730@adacore.com> <83pr4adb1g.fsf@gnu.org> <20100212104105.GN2919@adacore.com> <83k4uid5my.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83k4uid5my.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00093.txt.bz2 > Thanks. So I guess half of that item was resolved by Vladimir's patch > which I just approved, is that right? Right. Regarding the internal documentation (how to non-stop for your favorite arch-target), Pedro confirmed that this is certainly not essential for the release, so I'm about to remove that item from the list. This really leaves us with 2 remaining items: - A patch waiting for review - A problem for which we are looking for a workaround. -- Joel