From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22261 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2010 19:09:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 22252 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Feb 2010 19:09:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:09:27 +0000 Received: (qmail 16888 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2010 19:09:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caradoc.them.org) (dan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 11 Feb 2010 19:09:26 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:09:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jim Ingham Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB steping into STL Headers. Message-ID: <20100211190921.GA20235@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Ingham , gdb@sourceware.org References: <27535106.post@talk.nabble.com> <27542787.post@talk.nabble.com> <1CF86F7D-0B47-47D7-A6E2-24853D50653D@apple.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1CF86F7D-0B47-47D7-A6E2-24853D50653D@apple.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:03:08AM -0800, Jim Ingham wrote: > It sounds like the STL code got inlined? Then next would also step > in, since gdb doesn't see inlined functions as new frames. Maybe your GDB doesn't :-P GDB 7.0 does support inlined functions - if your compiler outputs correct DWARF, at least. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery