From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8900 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2010 16:27:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 8892 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Feb 2010 16:27:54 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-173-76-58-83.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (173.76.58.83) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:27:47 +0000 Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CC013C0C7; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:27:37 -0500 (EST) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id ACEA52B35A; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:27:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:27:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Kai Tietz , Chris Sutcliffe , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [gdb-7.1] 10 days to branching... Message-ID: <20100202162737.GB8953@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Kai Tietz , Chris Sutcliffe , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20100201081928.GA9204@adacore.com> <2bf229d31002010809o2cb8760du9a52c9b996e91c56@mail.gmail.com> <20100202041644.GN8831@adacore.com> <2bf229d31002020435v7c804a91w9c74b7ed2eff4314@mail.gmail.com> <90baa01f1002020802icf6aa90oa28466ed7cf3ae29@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <90baa01f1002020802icf6aa90oa28466ed7cf3ae29@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 05:02:11PM +0100, Kai Tietz wrote: >2010/2/2 Chris Sutcliffe : >>> I don't know - I had never heard of anyone doing this kind of build >>> before: ?From what I can tell, you are building a MinGW debugger using >>> a cygwin compiler. ?If no one answered, it's probably because no one >>> has anything to say (including: "that ought to work"). ?Have you tried >>> using a MinGW compiler instead? >> >> For the mingw-w64 build, I did indeed build from within Cygwin using >> the mingw-w64 cross compiling toolchain provided by the mingw-w64 >> project. ?For the MinGW32 binary I built it using MSYS and the MinGW >> compiler. ?In both cases this is the method I used to the build the >> 7.0.1 binary. > >Yes, I can confirm that buiding on a cygwin host by a valid >cross-compiler is working nicely. I justed tried, and for me it still >works. Possibly an issue about passed configure options? > >Just one point I found today. The new break-point handling seems to >have problems in certain ways for me (at least on win32 versions). I >get in case of setting breakpoints in Obj-C always the assertation >'set_raw_breakpoint: Assertation sal.pspace != NULL' failed'. This is >new and is somehow related to recent enhancements to breakpoint >handling. I haven't noticed this but I haven't rebuilt my version of gdb in a couple of months. I'll take a look tonight when I get home. Or, maybe someone can provide some (excuse the expression) insight before then. cgf