From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4670 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2010 21:24:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 4662 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jan 2010 21:24:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:24:48 +0000 Received: (qmail 17631 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2010 21:24:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caradoc.them.org) (dan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 21 Jan 2010 21:24:47 -0000 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:24:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, Stan Shebs , Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: [RFC] "actionpoints"? Message-ID: <20100121212444.GB11880@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , gdb@sourceware.org, Stan Shebs , Joel Brobecker References: <4B5106CB.5060204@codesourcery.com> <20100118064348.GA1914@adacore.com> <4B54AC04.7090204@codesourcery.com> <201001181904.25569.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201001181904.25569.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00175.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 07:04:25PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > I vote for "actionpoint". It's standardized by HPD, for what > that's worth, and used by at least one other major debugger to > represent the same thing being proposed here. For what it's worth, I like this too. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery