From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22750 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2010 19:04:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 22680 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jan 2010 19:04:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:04:19 +0000 Received: (qmail 3113 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2010 19:04:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 18 Jan 2010 19:04:18 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] "actionpoints"? Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:04:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Stan Shebs , Joel Brobecker References: <4B5106CB.5060204@codesourcery.com> <20100118064348.GA1914@adacore.com> <4B54AC04.7090204@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <4B54AC04.7090204@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201001181904.25569.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00159.txt.bz2 I vote for "actionpoint". It's standardized by HPD, for what that's worth, and used by at least one other major debugger to represent the same thing being proposed here. This is just a name afterall, people get used to all kinds of names with no effort, even though in this case "action point" actually makes sense. -- Pedro Alves