From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-36668-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31812 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2010 14:36:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 31803 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jan 2010 14:36:19 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:36:16 +0000
Received: (qmail 25902 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2010 14:36:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO orlando) (pedro@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 11 Jan 2010 14:36:14 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,  Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: GDB 7.1 release planning...
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:36:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
Cc: Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>,  gdb@sourceware.org
References: <20100108042117.GK4623@adacore.com> <4B47C3CE.3070307@codesourcery.com> <20100109033134.GC27914@adacore.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100109033134.GC27914@adacore.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <201001111436.15322.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00111.txt.bz2

On Saturday 09 January 2010 03:31:34, Joel Brobecker wrote:

> New proposed dates: Branch & Pre-release: Feb 10. That's 3 extra weeks.
> Are you guys pretty confident you can make it? That would put the
> tentative a couple of weeks later, around Feb 24 [1].

Probably, thanks.  Note that we also have further tracepoint
actions and breakpoint commands unification and MI tracepoints
support in the queue.  Eclipse is being enhanced with tracepoint
support and is relying on these changes, so it would be nice to
have them in 7.1 too.  Not sure who has the ball on those,
either Stan or Vladimir, not me, I think.

-- 
Pedro Alves