From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12826 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2010 03:31:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 12816 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jan 2010 03:31:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 03:31:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19BF2BAB89; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 22:31:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id uk71Ee1+8EsW; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 22:31:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386432BAB7C; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 22:31:44 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E322FF595E; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 07:31:34 +0400 (RET) Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 03:31:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Stan Shebs Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 7.1 release planning... Message-ID: <20100109033134.GC27914@adacore.com> References: <20100108042117.GK4623@adacore.com> <4B478742.4080605@codesourcery.com> <201001082207.13477.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4B47C3CE.3070307@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B47C3CE.3070307@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00086.txt.bz2 > In any case, I think the gdbserver bits are sufficiently exciting to > be worth pushing back 7.1 by a couple weeks. Plus we lose some > momentum if new tracepoint features are in 7.1, but target-side code > with which to try them out doesn't show up until 7.2. I think that would be fine - I don't want the dates, which are somewhat chose arbitrarily on a roughly-6-months-calendar, to hurt certain new features. We pretty much did the same for Python the last time. Also, I don't think people are waiting for 7.1 with as much anticipation as they did for 7.0. It took a lot of time and effort before we were ready! New proposed dates: Branch & Pre-release: Feb 10. That's 3 extra weeks. Are you guys pretty confident you can make it? That would put the tentative a couple of weeks later, around Feb 24 [1]. -- Joel [1]: Note that I will not be available Feb 20-24 (incl), and then Mar 01-02.