From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9334 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2010 03:18:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 9322 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jan 2010 03:17:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 03:17:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290992BAB89; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 22:17:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3QSexkEYvSCL; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 22:17:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13F72BAB6B; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 22:17:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 883C8F595E; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 07:17:44 +0400 (RET) Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 03:18:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 7.1 release planning... Message-ID: <20100109031744.GB27914@adacore.com> References: <20100108042117.GK4623@adacore.com> <20100108135258.GA6814@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 > The filtered backtrace work is not fully baked yet. We know it is still > missing some needed features, at least. Is this important enough that we want to make it a priority? Do we know which pieces need some work. On a side note, what about the Google SoC work? I think it was about inferior-events, right? I tried to look at it a few weeks ago, out of curiosity, but couldn't find which branch it is a part of? Does anyone know? How far are we from being able to submit the code for inclusion in the FSF tree? I don't want us to press this feature for 7.1, but it'd be nice to not lose all this work. I volunteer to clean it up later this year. -- Joel