From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10878 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2010 04:21:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 10866 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jan 2010 04:21:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 04:21:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1132D2BABE6 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 23:21:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9XHGbN4EbrjJ for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 23:21:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E282BAB7E for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 23:21:25 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 584B9F595E; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 08:21:17 +0400 (RET) Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 04:21:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: GDB 7.1 release planning... Message-ID: <20100108042117.GK4623@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2 Hello, Time flies. I didn't realize this, but the tentative date for creating the GDB 7.1 branch was set to Jan 20th, so only 12 days away from now. It might be a little tight (or not) depending on what we'd like to have in this release. Is there anything that would be blocking for the branch creation? There is a Wiki page for the gdb-7.1 release: http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDB_7.1_Release There's been one item for a while but it's about documentation, which is not blocking for the branch (might already be done too). Anything that would be highly desirable and would potentially justify delaying the branch? Thanks, -- Joel