From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15904 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2009 17:02:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 15819 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Dec 2009 17:02:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from lo.gmane.org (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:02:08 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NNUaW-00068v-Eb for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:01:28 +0100 Received: from 82-68-48-14.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk ([82.68.48.14]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:01:28 +0100 Received: from jsmith by 82-68-48-14.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:01:28 +0100 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com From: Julian Smith Subject: reverse-next doing repeated reverse-stepi's ? Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091223170048.88d90ba6.jsmith@undo-software.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00146.txt.bz2 I've been trying out reverse-next with UndoDB as a remote debug server, and it looks like reverse-next works by doing repeated `bs' (reverse-stepi) commands. I was expecting it to set breakpoints and do `bc' (reverse-continue) commands, by analogy with normal forwards step etc. Am i doing something wrong here ? Or is this the expected behaviour ? Thanks, - Julian -- http://undo-software.com/