From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18931 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2009 09:07:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 18920 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Dec 2009 09:07:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:07:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nBL97BDJ021707 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:07:12 -0500 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nBL979YO008802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:07:11 -0500 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBL978aN015214; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:07:08 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBL978EZ015213; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:07:08 +0100 Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:07:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: time to create the gdb-7.0.1 release (?) Message-ID: <20091221090708.GA14567@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20091218061736.GV2804@adacore.com> <20091219180214.GA13414@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20091221060046.GX7752@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091221060046.GX7752@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00134.txt.bz2 On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:00:46 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote: > I did not see much point in regarding the testsuite patches, but checked > them in anyway, in case some people are in fact interested in the > testsuite results for the branch It was intended to make life easier for distro maintainers > (I personally only follow the results on the HEAD). while upstream probably does not wish they would use HEAD. > The patch that I did not commit was: > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-08/msg00448.html > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2009-08/msg00139.html > Re: [patch] Support constant DW_AT_data_member_location by GCC PR debug/40659 ... > As far as I can tell, this one is already in the branch (was checked > in before the branch got cut). OK, sorry, too many branches around. Also this one was checked in HEAD already before branching: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2009-09/msg00009.html http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-09/msg00027.html Re: RFC: DW_OP_call_frame_cfa, again > Let me know, because I'd like to make the release RSN. Fine with me, thanks. Regards, Jan