From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30407 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2009 06:01:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 30303 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Dec 2009 06:01:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:01:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D762BAB4C; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:01:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id eGu4diETvsKM; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:01:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1D02BAB3C; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:01:03 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A94A6F5899; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:00:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:01:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: time to create the gdb-7.0.1 release (?) Message-ID: <20091221060046.GX7752@adacore.com> References: <20091218061736.GV2804@adacore.com> <20091219180214.GA13414@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091219180214.GA13414@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00133.txt.bz2 Nice research work! I checked all the patches you proposed, except for one (see below). I hesitated a bit on the dcache invalidate fix, but checked it in in the end, mostly because of the symptoms (infinite loop). If we have any problem with it, either 7.1 will soon be out, or I'll make an emergency 7.0.2. I did not see much point in regarding the testsuite patches, but checked them in anyway, in case some people are in fact interested in the testsuite results for the branch (I personally only follow the results on the HEAD). The patch that I did not commit was: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-08/msg00448.html http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2009-08/msg00139.html Re: [patch] Support constant DW_AT_data_member_location by GCC PR debug/40659 Support constant DW_AT_data_member_location by GCC PR debug/40659. * dwarf2read.c (dwarf2_add_field ): Initialize BYTE_OFFSET to 0 by default. Explicitly check if attr_form_is_block. (dwarf2_add_field ) (read_common_block ): New variable byte_offset. Fix crash on non-DW_BLOCK ATTR values. Support constant DW_AT_data_member_location by GCC PR debug/40659. * gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance.exp, gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance.S: New. As far as I can tell, this one is already in the branch (was checked in before the branch got cut). Do you actually see a SEGV with gdb-7.0? If yes, must be something else... Let me know, because I'd like to make the release RSN. -- Joel