From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-36440-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10289 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2009 14:05:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 10108 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Dec 2009 14:05:28 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:05:23 +0000
Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30D210D91; 	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:05:21 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) 	by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2CE1078C; 	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:05:21 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) 	(envelope-from <drow@caradoc.them.org>) 	id 1NIjdv-0008QK-Dv; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:05:19 -0500
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:05:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Does m68klinux-tdep.c handle uclinux too
Message-ID: <20091210140519.GA32131@caradoc.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>, 	gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <200912101252.29827.vladimir@codesourcery.com>  <200912101413.13246.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200912101413.13246.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00063.txt.bz2

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 02:13:13PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > looking at m68klinux-tdep.c, I see this:
> > 
> >   if (target_is_uclinux == -1)
> >     {
> >       /* Determine whether we are running on a uClinux or normal GNU/Linux
> >          target so we can use the correct sigcontext layouts.  */
> >       CORE_ADDR dummy;
> > 
> >       target_is_uclinux
> >         = (target_auxv_search (&current_target, AT_NULL, &dummy) > 0
> > 	   && target_auxv_search (&current_target, AT_PAGESZ, &dummy) == 0);
> >     }

I think I or someone else at CodeSourcery wrote that.  So it was
probably submitted from our internal tree.

> FWIW, below is a local patch that we have. Does it seem reasonable?

IMO this is OK.

It would also be OK to have just m68k-tdep.o and m68klinux-tdep.o.
GDB doesn't support m68k uclinux shared libraries.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery