From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19636 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2009 18:48:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 19624 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2009 18:48:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:48:53 +0000 Received: (qmail 23722 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2009 18:48:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 9 Nov 2009 18:48:48 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Thoughts on the GDB "documentation" web page Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:09:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Joel Brobecker References: <20091109174427.GR22192@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20091109174427.GR22192@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200911091848.46732.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00098.txt.bz2 On Monday 09 November 2009 17:44:27, Joel Brobecker wrote: > =A0 =A0 | =A0 =A0Online GDB Documentation > =A0 =A0 | =A0 =A0GDB provides a set of documents (including manuals) that= are > =A0 =A0 | =A0 =A0available from the links below: > =A0 =A0 | =A0 =A0 =A0* For the last release > =A0 =A0 | =A0 =A0 =A0* For the head branch > =A0 =A0 | =A0 =A0 =A0* For the currently active branch > =A0 =A0 | > =A0 =A0 | =A0 =A0Printed Manuals > =A0 =A0 | =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 | > =A0 =A0 | =A0 =A0Translated manuals > =A0 =A0 | =A0 =A0Translations of the GDB manual are also available: > =A0 =A0 | =A0 =A0 =A0[...] >=20 I never quite understood the policy of having "last release" up only. Why not have something like the gcc folks have? http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ These are manuals for the latest releases. * GDB 7.0 manuals: o GDB User Manual (also in PDF or Post= Script or an HTML tarball) o GDB Internals Manual (also in PDF or PostScript or an HTML tarball) * GDB 6.8 manuals: o GDB User Manual (also in PDF or PostScript or an HTML tarball) o GDB Internals Manual (also in PDF or PostScript or an HTML tarb= all) * GDB 6.7 manuals: o GDB User Manual (also in PDF or PostScript or an HTML tarball) o GDB Internals Manual (also in PDF or PostScript or an HTML tarb= all) ... Current development Please note that the following documentation refers to current development.= Some information may not be applicable to any existing release. o GDB User Manual (also in PDF or PostScript or an HTML tarball) o GDB Internals Manual (also in PDF or PostScript or an HTML tarb= all) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This gives emphasis to _releases_, which, IMO is the right thing to do. One problem with the "last release" kind of links is that "last release" is not stable over time. A scheme like the above has no such problem. A cross-link from a random site to to a page in our 6.8 manual should be live forever; something that is not true currently. --=20 Pedro Alves