From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6818 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2009 19:43:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 6810 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2009 19:43:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:43:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F8F2BACAD; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:43:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id t+eBn3TTBKqO; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:43:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC642BAC64; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:43:20 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B74DEF5905; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:43:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:43:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: James Pandavan Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb v7.0 - user defined command's document section - space prefixed end Message-ID: <20091103194313.GS4573@adacore.com> References: <4AE7D19A.70600@googlemail.com> <20091103143305.GN4573@adacore.com> <4AF07D60.2020305@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AF07D60.2020305@googlemail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2 > I noticed my scripts didn't work under v7.0 only when I saw this bug in > launchpad. I guess I am not the only one who has indented "ends" this way > :) > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdb/+bug/461594 If you could maybe help us a little bit, and track down the author of the patch that introduced the change of behavior, and then ask him whether the change was intended? Thanks, -- Joel