From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21371 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2009 14:32:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 21362 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Oct 2009 14:32:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:32:46 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E27510B94; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:32:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09EF7109F9; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:32:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N2n6I-0000GL-Gv; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:32:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:04:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "Joshua D. Boyd" Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Extended a new target from target remote Message-ID: <20091027143242.GA560@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Joshua D. Boyd" , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20091026234202.GK1461@pixie> <20091026234505.GA6521@caradoc.them.org> <20091027001148.GL1461@pixie> <20091027022155.GA20914@caradoc.them.org> <20091027023953.GA11541@pixie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091027023953.GA11541@pixie> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00387.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:39:53PM -0400, Joshua D. Boyd wrote: > I tried briefly to move this work up to GDB 7.0, but I got trying to > move the bfd changes forward and had to put the upgrade to the side for > now. GDB 7.0 certainly looks great though. This is the first time I've > ran around installing a new version of GDB from source on every linux > machine I use. OK. That's a pity. You would have an easier time with this problem in the current GDB sources. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery