From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8038 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2009 09:59:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 8022 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Oct 2009 09:59:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:59:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51AD2BAC34; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:59:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 1NPW9+-ZvSw3; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:59:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D532BAB97; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:59:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2DC07F5905; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:59:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:30:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Paul Pluzhnikov Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Pedro Alves , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Breakpoint commands Message-ID: <20091026095900.GB24532@adacore.com> References: <83iqe4g9t2.fsf@gnu.org> <200910241704.00548.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83hbtog3fv.fsf@gnu.org> <8ac60eac0910241229g44d8d657ve8f888f1a606790b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0910241229g44d8d657ve8f888f1a606790b@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00375.txt.bz2 > It's probably not too difficult to implement "if you encounter any > other breakpoint with its own command list while executing the > original command list, the original command list is abandoned" policy. > I'll open a feature request unless somebody explains why this would be > a bad idea. I think it would indeed be a big improvement. I was hoping that the issue would go away with python support, but anyone who learnt about this behavior was surprised and found the argument to be very weak. -- Joel