From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30240 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2009 18:00:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 30230 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Oct 2009 18:00:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:00:31 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2EE10CF8; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:02:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B5A10B94; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:02:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MxPC7-0000YW-La; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:00:27 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:00:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Documentation generated from sources proposal Message-ID: <20091012180027.GA2107@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jan Kratochvil , Tom Tromey , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20091012161424.GA20603@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20091012171556.GA31648@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091012171556.GA31648@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00215.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 07:15:56PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:12:25 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > > I would like to do this, but my understanding is that there is a > > licensing problem, in that the source is GPL and the documentation is > > GFDL. (Joseph Myers has mentioned this several times on the GCC lists.) > > > > Until that is resolved I don't think any progress can be made here. > > Still GDB can already start using new gdbint-type documentation parts in the > sources instead of writing it in gdbint.texinfo and obsoleting the parts in > gdbint.texinfo, just one cannot move updated parts. Not without changing the license of the GDB Internals manual. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery