From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24952 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2009 17:16:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 24942 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Oct 2009 17:16:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:16:03 +0000 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9CHG219027045 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:16:02 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9CHFwko002793 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:16:01 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9CHFwBM031931; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:15:58 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n9CHFuwb031928; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:15:56 +0200 Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:16:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Documentation generated from sources proposal Message-ID: <20091012171556.GA31648@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20091012161424.GA20603@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00213.txt.bz2 On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:12:25 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > I would like to do this, but my understanding is that there is a > licensing problem, in that the source is GPL and the documentation is > GFDL. (Joseph Myers has mentioned this several times on the GCC lists.) > > Until that is resolved I don't think any progress can be made here. Still GDB can already start using new gdbint-type documentation parts in the sources instead of writing it in gdbint.texinfo and obsoleting the parts in gdbint.texinfo, just one cannot move updated parts. Regards, Jan