From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11310 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2009 16:54:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 11302 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Oct 2009 16:54:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:54:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58AD12BABFD; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 12:53:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 2GVXOW8leYIx; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 12:53:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5ED22BAB7A; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 12:53:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8714BF5921; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:53:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:54:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jack Howarth Cc: Tom Tromey , Paul Pluzhnikov , Anirban Sinha , gdb@sourceware.org, Michael Snyder Subject: Re: FW: gdb seems to be broken on darwin 10.5.8 and later Message-ID: <20091005165354.GB29600@adacore.com> References: <8ac60eac0909302034s3f67ed8fxc84fa5544740dd21@mail.gmail.com> <20091002015530.GB29817@bromo.med.uc.edu> <8ac60eac0910011913v762a312eh7edb63c9e3730586@mail.gmail.com> <20091002153739.GN6532@adacore.com> <20091005025700.GA5715@adacore.com> <20091005130310.GA25614@bromo.med.uc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091005130310.GA25614@bromo.med.uc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 > I ran the make check on gdb cvs last night (without an ada compiler > installed) and the test results seemed reasonable. Does gdb have anything > like the contrib/test_summary script from gcc so that a shorter summary > can be generated for the gdb-testers mailing list? I thought I would > post some full test results in case any particular failures jumped out > as being low hanging fruit for fixing. Unfortunately not. People usually post a gzip'ed version of the gdb.sum file. The gdb.log file might be too big to post, I don't know. You look very interested in gdb on MacOS, perhaps you should consider helping us fix the issues you're finding, because there aren't many people who are. We can help you through the learning curve, if you have questions (join us at #gdb on irc.freenode.net). -- Joel