From: Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>,
Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>,
Anirban Sinha <ASinha@zeugmasystems.com>,
gdb@sourceware.org, Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: FW: gdb seems to be broken on darwin 10.5.8 and later
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:03:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091005130310.GA25614@bromo.med.uc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091005025700.GA5715@adacore.com>
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 07:57:00PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > >> I am not sure how Joel wants to handle this WRT the 7.0 branch; none
> > >> of the other maintainers chimed in :-(
> >
> > Joel> Did Jack confirm that it does not work without applying your patch?
> >
> > I read the referenced email. If the only issue with the patch is that
> > it is not the best possible way to fix the problem, then I think it
> > might as well go in. I say that because I think it generally preferable
> > to commit a functioning patch rather than wait for a more ideal patch.
>
> Jack came back to me a couple of days ago, and confirmed that the debugger
> apperas to work even without the patch. We can try to do without, at least
> until we confirm that it really does help.
>
> --
> Joel
Joel,
I ran the make check on gdb cvs last night (without an ada compiler
installed) and the test results seemed reasonable. Does gdb have anything
like the contrib/test_summary script from gcc so that a shorter summary
can be generated for the gdb-testers mailing list? I thought I would
post some full test results in case any particular failures jumped out
as being low hanging fruit for fixing.
Jack
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-05 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-30 20:37 Anirban Sinha
2009-10-01 3:34 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-02 1:55 ` Jack Howarth
2009-10-02 2:13 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-02 15:37 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-02 16:03 ` Tom Tromey
2009-10-02 16:21 ` Jack Howarth
2009-10-05 2:57 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-05 13:03 ` Jack Howarth [this message]
2009-10-05 16:54 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-05 22:13 ` Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091005130310.GA25614@bromo.med.uc.edu \
--to=howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu \
--cc=ASinha@zeugmasystems.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
--cc=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox