From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3577 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2009 16:20:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 3567 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Oct 2009 16:20:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:20:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959972BABC2; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 12:20:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id PilVjM6PWPID; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 12:20:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC512BABBF; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 12:20:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6D23EF5906; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:20:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:20:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jack Howarth Cc: Jonas Maebe , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb seems to be broken on darwin 10.5.8 and later Message-ID: <20091002162032.GP6532@adacore.com> References: <20090930162038.GA7190@bromo.med.uc.edu> <8A12DBCB-8C04-4FAD-85ED-2447CD01F1ED@elis.ugent.be> <20091002015303.GA29817@bromo.med.uc.edu> <20091002154001.GO6532@adacore.com> <20091002161240.GA6532@bromo.med.uc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091002161240.GA6532@bromo.med.uc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 > I was just curious if this was being seen on linux as well or just > on darwin. FYI, the source code for this example is at... The general issue of debugging optimized code from GCC is independent of the platform. There are some projects out there that try to improve the situation, I'm not really familiar with the GCC project to tell you more (Alexander Oliva was involved in one of these efforts, I think). -- Joel