From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14498 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2009 15:37:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 14476 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Oct 2009 15:37:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:37:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA9B2BAB6C; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:37:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id S1QCycsOgyWN; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:37:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348502BABB4; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:37:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 02D18F5906; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:37:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:37:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Paul Pluzhnikov Cc: Jack Howarth , Anirban Sinha , gdb@sourceware.org, Michael Snyder , Tom Tromey Subject: Re: FW: gdb seems to be broken on darwin 10.5.8 and later Message-ID: <20091002153739.GN6532@adacore.com> References: <8ac60eac0909302034s3f67ed8fxc84fa5544740dd21@mail.gmail.com> <20091002015530.GB29817@bromo.med.uc.edu> <8ac60eac0910011913v762a312eh7edb63c9e3730586@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0910011913v762a312eh7edb63c9e3730586@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2 > I am not sure how Joel wants to handle this WRT the 7.0 branch; none > of the other maintainers chimed in :-( Did Jack confirm that it does not work without applying your patch? So far, I said that AdaCore was going to use that patch for sure, just to be on the safe side, but that I can live without it in the FSF tree if no one else is interested in it. If GDB is completely broken without it, then I think we have to include it in the FSF sources too. We need confirmation from Jack pronto, because the 7.0 release is approaching really fast. -- Joel