From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-35752-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14564 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2009 18:37:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 14555 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Oct 2009 18:37:45 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:37:39 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n91IadH4007474; 	Thu, 1 Oct 2009 20:36:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n91IacEh027960; 	Thu, 1 Oct 2009 20:36:39 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:37:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200910011836.n91IacEh027960@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: brobecker@adacore.com
CC: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, ralf.corsepius@rtems.org, gdb@sourceware.org,         jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, tromey@redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20091001182740.GG6532@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker 	on Thu, 1 Oct 2009 11:27:40 -0700)
Subject: Re: GDB 6.8.92 available for testing
References: <20090930204828.GB31446@adacore.com> <4AC41F44.1040502@rtems.org> <20091001170744.GC6532@adacore.com> <4AC4E4F6.5080500@rtems.org> <200910011733.n91HXDnX007084@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20091001182740.GG6532@adacore.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 11:27:40 -0700
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> 
> > Are we still turning off -Werror for releases?  In that case, there
> > really isn't a problem.
> 
> We don't anymore, but we can fix that. We have to decide whether to
> do it for this release, and what we want to do for future releases
> in general. It would make it simpler for non-contributors if the
> releases were built without -Werror.

Given that newer GCC versions get whinier and whinier and that we see
false positives from time to time, I would be in favour of disabling
-Werror for releases.