From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3466 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2009 18:16:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 3457 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Oct 2009 18:16:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:16:34 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225632BAB04; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:16:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id bQs5UWr9ZIdb; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:16:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47922BABAB; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:16:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D2B51F593D; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:11:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:16:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Ralf Corsepius Cc: Jan Kratochvil , gdb@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey Subject: Re: GDB 6.8.92 available for testing Message-ID: <20091001171156.GD6532@adacore.com> References: <20090930204828.GB31446@adacore.com> <4AC41F44.1040502@rtems.org> <20091001100900.GA16002@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <4AC4904C.8040204@rtems.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AC4904C.8040204@rtems.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 > You are forgetting about the 3rd parties, which apply distros as their > basis. Just to be clear: No one has any obligation towards you or us. We all make the code available in some form, but we all have local modifications that we have not submitted for one reason or another. You probably have your local modifications too, so why not just add Red Hat's patch in your list, and then work on helping us fixing the problem that causes this patch to be necessary? -- Joel