From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21195 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2009 20:39:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 21184 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Sep 2009 20:39:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_SUB_OBFU_Z X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:39:19 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5630C1065D; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:39:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9AF10555; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:39:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mt5xE-0002a9-59; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:39:16 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:39:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: xz for the new release tip Message-ID: <20090930203916.GA9710@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jan Kratochvil , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20090930202857.GA32600@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090930202857.GA32600@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00343.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:28:57PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > Hi, > > while currently the sources are release both as .tar.gz and as .tar.bz2 would > not it be worth to start using .xz as a replacement for the .bz2 variant? > > 13406892 bytes: gdb-6.8.91.20090930.tar.xz (xz -9) > xz -dc: real 0m1.226s user 0m1.190s sys 0m0.037s > > 18453837 bytes: gdb-6.8.91.20090930.tar.bz2 > bzip2 -dc: real 0m3.775s user 0m3.755s sys 0m0.019s I think that fails any 'widely available' test - I can't even find a Debian package of it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery