From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-35715-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 2487 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2009 16:20:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 2477 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Sep 2009 16:20:46 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from bromo.med.uc.edu (HELO bromo.med.uc.edu) (129.137.3.146)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:20:41 +0000
Received: from bromo.med.uc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) 	by bromo.med.uc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E81C1B2D53; 	Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:20:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from howarth@localhost) 	by bromo.med.uc.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8UGKcgF007225; 	Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:20:38 -0400
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:20:00 -0000
From: Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>
To: Anirban Sinha <ASinha@zeugmasystems.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [gdb-7.0] One week to the gdb-7.0 release!
Message-ID: <20090930162038.GA7190@bromo.med.uc.edu>
References: <20090923220907.GA5150@adacore.com> <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C501FD7F63@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local> <20090930001332.GA5072@adacore.com> <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C501FD7F8F@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C501FD7F8F@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00333.txt.bz2

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 05:44:18PM -0700, Anirban Sinha wrote:
> >We've had some last-second instability on the branch, which we should
> >now have taken care of.  Unless we find some evidence of the contrary,
> >we're now thinking that it would be more prudent to extend the testing
> >period for a few more days, probably until Monday or Tuesday next week.
> 
> Sigh ...

   I haven't tested the gdb 7.0 branch yet, but gdb trunk seems to be
totally broken now on darwin even with the proposed patch...

http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-09/msg00430.html

Now gdb errors out earlier and claims that darwin executables
aren't valid executable files. Is anyone else seeing that on
darwin?
           Jack
ps This is from './dist/bin/gdb ./a.out'.