From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27405 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2009 12:57:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 27397 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Sep 2009 12:57:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from bromo.med.uc.edu (HELO bromo.med.uc.edu) (129.137.3.146) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:56:56 +0000 Received: from bromo.med.uc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bromo.med.uc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFB4B2DBB; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:56:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from howarth@localhost) by bromo.med.uc.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8LCus1n030102; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:56:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:57:00 -0000 From: Jack Howarth To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Paul Pluzhnikov , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB 7.0 release process created Message-ID: <20090921125654.GA30075@bromo.med.uc.edu> References: <20090920025432.GA22104@bromo.med.uc.edu> <8ac60eac0909192050g256a1076r3e28fd0a8cfd7f41@mail.gmail.com> <20090920143231.GQ7961@adacore.com> <8ac60eac0909200802m45f2675epa6e56001af4b491@mail.gmail.com> <20090920152741.GR7961@adacore.com> <8ac60eac0909200914g39a2d471j601aebd995da1d02@mail.gmail.com> <20090920171154.GT7961@adacore.com> <20090920173607.GA18628@bromo.med.uc.edu> <8ac60eac0909201137h3b357f95hc9471ed186575c06@mail.gmail.com> <20090921043410.GA25454@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090921043410.GA25454@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00264.txt.bz2 On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 09:34:10PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > As far as I can tell, it seems to be working fine for me, at least on > the simple program that I used, but I think that this is because I am > using darwin 9.6. I just did a rebuild and a quick sanity check, no > issues to report except some annoying warnings that shouldn't be there: > Joel, I suspect it would break if you upgraded to 10.5.8 (which would be what 99+% of the end-users on Leopard would be running). I'll try to get an answer on this from the compiler developers at Apple (as to what is the correct fix). Hopefully we don't have to force users to add themselves to groups and there is another approach. Jack