From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8923 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2009 17:36:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 8912 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Sep 2009 17:36:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from bromo.med.uc.edu (HELO bromo.med.uc.edu) (129.137.3.146) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:36:09 +0000 Received: from bromo.med.uc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bromo.med.uc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EC9B0074; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:36:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from howarth@localhost) by bromo.med.uc.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8KHa77o018673; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:36:07 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:36:00 -0000 From: Jack Howarth To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Paul Pluzhnikov , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB 7.0 release process created Message-ID: <20090920173607.GA18628@bromo.med.uc.edu> References: <20090920025432.GA22104@bromo.med.uc.edu> <8ac60eac0909192050g256a1076r3e28fd0a8cfd7f41@mail.gmail.com> <20090920143231.GQ7961@adacore.com> <8ac60eac0909200802m45f2675epa6e56001af4b491@mail.gmail.com> <20090920152741.GR7961@adacore.com> <8ac60eac0909200914g39a2d471j601aebd995da1d02@mail.gmail.com> <20090920171154.GT7961@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090920171154.GT7961@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00248.txt.bz2 On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:11:54AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > That's what I suggested we do a few days ago, before we cut the branch. > But I haven't had a chance to test this much. Right now, AdaCore has > a separate branch for x86-darwin GDB, that we used to develop the port. > We're trying to move to gdb-7.0, but we haven't had time to complete > the integration and until then, testing is difficult. I definitely > plan on completing this part before 7.0 is out, however. > > In the meantime, I'll see if I can reproduce Jack's issue with the > latest sources. > > -- > Joel Just to be clear, if I add... http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-09/msg00430.htm to gdb cvs on x86_64-apple-darwin, I still see the warnings... GNU gdb (GDB) 7.0.50.20090920-cvs Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-apple-darwin10". For bug reporting instructions, please see: ... Reading symbols from /Users/howarth/a.out... warning: dsym file UUID doesn't match the one in /Users/howarth/a.out warning: section __DATA.__common not found in /Users/howarth/himenoBMTxpa.o (no debugging symbols found)...done. but I also see... (gdb) break 4 Breakpoint 1 at 0x10000154c: file himenoBMTxpa.c, line 4. (gdb) r Starting program: /Users/howarth/a.out Unable to find Mach task port for process-id 154: (os/kern) failure (0x5). (please check gdb is setgid procmod) (gdb) So it seems like breakpoints can be set but their is a setgid problem. Jack