From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2525 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2009 19:30:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 2434 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Sep 2009 19:30:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:30:49 +0000 Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n89JUVEE001066; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 21:30:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n89JUVe9019544; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 21:30:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:30:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200909091930.n89JUVe9019544@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: andreast-list@fgznet.ch CC: gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <4AA7FEA3.9000808@fgznet.ch> (message from Andreas Tobler on Wed, 09 Sep 2009 21:14:43 +0200) Subject: Re: powerpc port question References: <4AA7F35A.8080705@fgznet.ch> <200909091849.n89Inmkr014770@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4AA7FEA3.9000808@fgznet.ch> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00150.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 21:14:43 +0200 > From: Andreas Tobler > > But now I hunt for this: > with my built gdb 'show endian' shows this: > > (gdb) show endian > The target is assumed to be big endian > > On my linuxppc machine I see this: > > (gdb) show endian > The target endianness is set automatically (currently big endian) > > The reason I'm not satisfied is, that inside the testsuite it looks > exactly for the automatically set endianness string. (altivec tests). > > I still wonder what my port lacks to spit out the same message as > powerpc linux does? I get the same message on OpenBSD that you're seeing on Linux. And I don't think I do something special on OpenBSD to get that behaviour. The problem may very well lie in how you've configured BFD.