From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10064 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2009 23:07:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 10054 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Sep 2009 23:07:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_HTML_CNTR_TBL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:06:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74852BAB27 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 19:06:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id nXCz6nVIuuCS for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 19:06:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3EE2BAB04 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 19:06:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 925E4F589B; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:06:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:07:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [gdb-7.0 release] 2009-09-02 status and proposed plan Message-ID: <20090904230653.GE30697@adacore.com> References: <20090902164425.GR4379@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090902164425.GR4379@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00098.txt.bz2 --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 525 > In terms of dates [...] I just committed the attached patch to the GDB schedule page. It now shows target dates for 7.0 and 7.1. One thing I should mention that I didn't talk about is the pre-release. I've set the date of the pre-release the day after the branch is cut. Given how careful we are in cleaning up HEAD before taking the branch, I figured there is no point in waiting before cutting the first pre- release. The sooner we create that pre-release, the more chances we have of people giving it a try. -- Joel --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="schedule.diff" Content-length: 1896 Index: schedule/index.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gdb/htdocs/schedule/index.html,v retrieving revision 1.40 diff -u -p -r1.40 index.html --- schedule/index.html 6 Feb 2009 01:07:05 -0000 1.40 +++ schedule/index.html 4 Sep 2009 23:01:24 -0000 @@ -51,19 +51,19 @@ Fish]" />
- + - + - + - + - +
CURRENT (6.8)NEXT (7.0)
CURRENT (7.0)NEXT (7.1)
Branch:February (2008-02-05)May (2009-05-08)Branch:September (2009-09-09)January (2010-01-20)
Pre-release:February (2008-02-19)May (2009-05-22)Pre-release:September (2009-09-10)January (2010-01-11)
Release:March (2008-03-04)June (2009-06-05)Release:September (2009-09-23)February (2010-02-03)
reSpin:N/ASeptember (2009-09-04)reSpin:December (2009-12-17)To Be Determined
@@ -84,7 +84,9 @@ equivalent amount. ReleaseEstimateScheduleActualSlip (months)Comment -6.82008-022008-022007-02-29 +7.02009-052009-05 + +6.82008-022008-022008-02-29 0 @@ -199,7 +201,7 @@ Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.

Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium, provided this notice is preserved.

-

Last modified 2009-02-05.

+

Last modified 2009-09-04.

--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU--