From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31290 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2009 15:48:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 31276 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Sep 2009 15:48:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e24smtp01.br.ibm.com (HELO e24smtp01.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.85) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:48:33 +0000 Received: from mailhub1.br.ibm.com (mailhub1.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.109]) by e24smtp01.br.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n84FnpNf017185 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:49:51 -0300 Received: from d24av04.br.ibm.com (d24av04.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.43]) by mailhub1.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n84Fn26e815604 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:49:02 -0300 Received: from d24av04.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av04.br.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id n84FmPxs009147 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:48:26 -0300 Received: from miki.localnet ([9.18.203.204]) by d24av04.br.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id n84FmCJ4008940 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:48:25 -0300 From: =?iso-8859-1?q?S=E9rgio_Durigan_J=FAnior?= To: Hui Zhu Subject: Re: [gdb-7.0 release] 2009-09-02 status and proposed plan Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:48:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.30.4; KDE/4.3.0; i686; ; ) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , tromey@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, gdb@sourceware.org References: <20090902164425.GR4379@adacore.com> <83skf490r6.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200909041248.10736.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00074.txt.bz2 Hello Hui and Eli, On Thursday 03 September 2009, Hui Zhu wrote: > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:15, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> From: Tom Tromey > >> Cc: gdb@sourceware.org > >> Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:26:28 -0600 > >> > >> There are a number of other unreviewed patches. I can try to make a > >> list if that would be helpful. > > > > I hope the catch syscalls is one of them. I never understood why it > > wasn't committed. (Apologies if it was and I just missed that.) > > Agree. And I didn't see the mail from S=E9rgio in a lot of months. > Maybe we need some help from other people in IBM. I am preparing my sixth version of this patch :-). I found an strange bug= =20 (and already fixed it), but didn't have time to prepare the patch for=20 resubmission yet. I intend to do so today. Thank you for remembering the catch syscall :-). Regards, --=20 S=E9rgio Durigan J=FAnior Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer Linux Technology Center - LTC IBM Brazil