From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [gdb-7.0 release] 2009-09-02 status and proposed plan
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 21:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090903213522.GG4379@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3d467g679.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
> I am unhappy with the facts of the situation: we've had a nice new
> feature, rewritten several times, pending since April. I know both from
> personal experience, and from talking to contributors, that this sort of
> thing is very demoralizing, and consequently hurts GDB.
I definitely share your feeling.
We should try to find ways to reduce the risk of this happening again,
and in the meantime let's try to be responsive to his patches. Have
the patches been sitting unreviewed since April?
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-03 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-02 16:44 Joel Brobecker
2009-09-02 17:09 ` Jack Howarth
2009-09-02 17:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-03 8:58 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-09-02 19:28 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-03 3:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-09-03 3:30 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-04 15:48 ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2009-09-03 19:28 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-03 19:53 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-03 21:35 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2009-09-04 15:44 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-04 21:34 ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2009-09-04 21:37 ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2009-09-04 21:37 ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2009-09-03 19:26 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-03 20:12 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-03 20:39 ` Matt Rice
2009-09-03 21:43 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-04 15:36 ` Doug Evans
2009-09-03 2:05 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-03 19:31 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-05 0:25 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-05 8:13 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-09-05 8:24 ` Jonas Maebe
2009-09-05 15:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-09-03 4:06 ` Doug Evans
2009-09-03 15:54 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-03 16:00 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-03 16:11 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-04 10:20 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-04 15:07 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-07 14:58 ` Pierre Muller
[not found] ` <8ac60eac0909072137g41f7b1f8q2e9e1e6d6d161fc5@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <000301ca309f$35d475d0$a17d6170$@u-strasbg.fr>
2009-09-08 20:41 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-03 19:33 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-04 15:25 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-04 17:59 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-04 18:03 ` Doug Evans
2009-09-05 0:29 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 17:43 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-14 17:52 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 18:20 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-15 20:28 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-09-03 18:34 ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-04 23:07 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-16 6:47 ` Hui Zhu
[not found] ` <F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC5153684DC5@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
2009-09-17 1:02 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090903213522.GG4379@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox