From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2133 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2009 15:17:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 2124 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Sep 2009 15:17:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:17:09 +0000 Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n82FGmNf030096; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:16:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n82FGlTf017321; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:16:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:17:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200909021516.n82FGlTf017321@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: tromey@redhat.com CC: teawater@gmail.com, gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Tom Tromey on Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:12:23 -0600) Subject: Re: Does gdb can handle longjmp in i386 and amd64 now? References: Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:12:23 -0600 > > >>>>> ">" == Hui Zhu writes: > > >> I try the following code with gdb in i386 and amd64: > > This is http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9270. glibc's PC > mangling confuses gdb. Pedro has a patch for this; I keep forgetting > what is holding it back. I think it was the fact that it requires GDB to dig into glibc internals in combination with Ulrich Drepper no wanting to commit keeping those internals consistent.