From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17844 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2009 22:01:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 17395 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Aug 2009 22:01:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 22:01:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCFF2BAB9E; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:01:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id jP4tUDATsr5c; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:01:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889DD2BAB9D; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:01:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 597FFF5893; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:53:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 07:28:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey , danny.backx@scarlet.be, Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Build question Message-ID: <20090822215313.GK5319@adacore.com> References: <1250803105.11282.96.camel@pavilion> <83d46pgjkq.fsf@gnu.org> <1250877901.11282.116.camel@pavilion> <83ab1tgh9h.fsf@gnu.org> <1250880746.11282.128.camel@pavilion> <20090822191338.GA17011@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090822191338.GA17011@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00226.txt.bz2 > > If you want to always define HAVE_DOS_BASED_FILE_SYSTEM, I guess that is > > possible. It is hard to picture when that would be appropriate for CVS > > GDB, though, due to --enable-targets=all. > > Joel, didn't you have a patch for this at some point? Or am I > imagining things? Not that I remember. To me, I've always wanted the debugger to use the filesystem conventions of the host (I haven't had a chance to look at the case where it would make sense to use the filesystem conventions of the target, yet). -- Joel