Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: george@codeplay.com (George Russell)
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Cell SDK GDB versus GNU GDB
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908171847.n7HIlDgR000786@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A8138AA.6060905@codeplay.com> from "George Russell" at Aug 11, 2009 11:23:54 AM

George Russell wrote:

> I am curious to know if the GNU gdb current versions have incorporated 
> the work on GDB done as a part of the Cell SDK. I would like to use 
> features of the MI interface of GDB present in GNU gdb, but absent in 
> the Cell SDK version.
> 
> Does anyone know the status of a merge, if any?

The bulk of the Cell SDK GDB features, in particular multi-architecture
debugging support, have now been merged into mainline GDB.

To the best of my knowledge, there are only two features that have not
been merged:

- Improved handling of multiple definitions of symbols of the same name:
  http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-05/msg00190.html

- SPU-specific GDB/MI extensions (-spu-info-...):
  http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2007-06/msg00020.html

[ In both cases, there was some concern in the community on whether the
feature and/or the implementation is the right way to go, and then we
didn't really follow up to bring the issues to a resolution. ]

If you do not specifically depend on either of those features, current
GDB mainline should work fine on Cell.  If you have any problems getting
it to work, please let me know ...

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-17 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-11  9:24 George Russell
2009-08-17 19:34 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2009-08-18 12:26   ` George Russell
2009-08-18 16:29     ` Ulrich Weigand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200908171847.n7HIlDgR000786@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com \
    --to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=george@codeplay.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox