RE: Reverse debugging

Nick Roberts
2009-07-18T01:06:47Z

> We do have a console and we do want it to be fully supported :-)
> But all commands sent from the console are redirected through
> our normal MI channel and I think this is the reason we
> are not a tty in that case.
>
> For example when turning off record from that console or from
> the eclipse buttons I get:
> "Delete recorded log and stop recording?(y or n) [answered Y; input not
> from terminal]"

It seems strange not to use a tty for the console since it is a terminal. It
allows you to change the terminal mode, although admittedly I've not found a
need for this. Also if you wanted to use readline, I guess it would need a
tty.

> I noticed that the previous CDT GDB integration has its console
> considered
> a tty. It may be worth looking into the difference... when time allows
> it :-)

> ...
> So you start GDB in CLI mode?

For the current and next release (23.x), yes.

--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob