From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29026 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2009 18:19:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 29016 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jul 2009 18:19:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:19:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8466D2BAB13; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:19:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Xg9w4f1uIIcu; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:19:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362F22BAAF7; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:19:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9F3BAF58A5; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 11:19:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:19:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Michael Snyder Cc: Jan Kratochvil , "gdb@sourceware.org" , Hui Zhu Subject: Re: Testing of reverse debug commands Message-ID: <20090712181904.GD10756@adacore.com> References: <4A5930EE.3040201@vmware.com> <20090712080145.GB10756@adacore.com> <20090712142834.GA3355@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <4A5A19FC.9050206@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A5A19FC.9050206@vmware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 > Does that mean y'all lean toward NOT making the > commands generate some output of their own? Generally speaking, I don't think that we should produce some output only if it is useful, not just for the sake of testing. I have no issue if you think a confirmation message would be useful. -- Joel