From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14042 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2009 21:31:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 14030 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jul 2009 21:31:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:31:52 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A96310576; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 21:31:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCA410554; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 21:31:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MOek1-0001WN-Dw; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 17:31:49 -0400 Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:31:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Sergey Kamshilin Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: core files are host dependent Message-ID: <20090708213149.GA2741@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Sergey Kamshilin , gdb@sourceware.org References: <343AAB782778D44FB06D24560CAFC0E30283F754@OREXCHANGE01.radisys.com> <20090708180619.GA22590@caradoc.them.org> <343AAB782778D44FB06D24560CAFC0E30283F7C0@OREXCHANGE01.radisys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <343AAB782778D44FB06D24560CAFC0E30283F7C0@OREXCHANGE01.radisys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:37:17PM -0700, Sergey Kamshilin wrote: > Daniel, > > Thank you for the note - it seems that traces are the same... After > closer look I found that /lib/ld-2.3.4.so are different on both > machines: Ah-hah. This usually means they have been prelinked to random addresses. I thought GDB knew how to correct for different prelink addresses, but I'm not sure about that. It helps to use a current GDB. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery