From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5821 invoked by alias); 20 May 2009 13:17:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 5807 invoked by uid 22791); 20 May 2009 13:17:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 May 2009 13:17:04 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B40108A5; Wed, 20 May 2009 13:17:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3AA1055A; Wed, 20 May 2009 13:17:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M6lfJ-0000nC-5v; Wed, 20 May 2009 09:17:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 13:17:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Peter Nordstrom Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: ARM VFP support Message-ID: <20090520131701.GA2980@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Peter Nordstrom , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20090401203824.GA23715@caradoc.them.org> <23626267.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090519233059.GA2322@caradoc.them.org> <23626852.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <23626852.post@talk.nabble.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00138.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 05:31:48PM -0700, Peter Nordstrom wrote: > > I'm still getting: > > /scratch/maxim/arm-lite/obj-4.3-arm-none-linux-gnueabi-lite/gdb-src-2009q1-176-arm-none-linux-gnueabi-i686-mingw32/gdb/regcache.c:178: > internal-error: register_size: Assertion `regnum >= 0 && regnum < > (gdbarch_num_regs (gdbarch) + gdbarch_num_pseudo_regs (gdbarch))' failed. > > any ideas? Do you need a target to reproduce this bug? If not, can you send me the binary? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery