From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-34412-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26876 invoked by alias); 16 May 2009 16:35:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 26867 invoked by uid 22791); 16 May 2009 16:35:16 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 May 2009 16:35:11 +0000
Received: (qmail 19135 invoked from network); 16 May 2009 16:35:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 16 May 2009 16:35:08 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: record mode supposed to work on x86_64-linux?
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 16:35:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
Cc: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>,  Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
References: <20090515184058.GA7326@basil.nowhere.org> <20090516092715.GJ16682@one.firstfloor.org> <daef60380905160251s6f0f5623t3f4ec9e55c533d65@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <daef60380905160251s6f0f5623t3f4ec9e55c533d65@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200905161735.35466.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00098.txt.bz2

On Saturday 16 May 2009 10:51:42, Hui Zhu wrote:
> Sorry.  I made a mistake in gdbarch.sh.
> How about this one?

There's no need for a new gdbarch method if you
implement what I suggested before:

 http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-05/msg00267.html

>=20
> Thanks,
> Hui
>=20
> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 17:27, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 05:09:12PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> >> Hi Andi,
> >>
> >> Thanks for remind me.
> >> I make a patch for it. =A0But I don't have a x86-64 close to me now.
> >> Could you help me test it?
> >
> > Gets
> >
> > ../../src/gdb/gdbarch.c:648: internal-error: verify_gdbarch: the follow=
ing are invalid ...
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0support_process_record
> > A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
> > further debugging may prove unreliable.
> >
> > at startup. I haven't tried further.
> >
> > -Andi
> >
>=20



--=20
Pedro Alves