From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-34370-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 27790 invoked by alias); 10 May 2009 08:39:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 27781 invoked by uid 22791); 10 May 2009 08:39:37 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 May 2009 08:39:30 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n4A8af1m002450; 	Sun, 10 May 2009 10:36:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n4A8adqi020695; 	Sun, 10 May 2009 10:36:39 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 08:39:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200905100836.n4A8adqi020695@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: paawan1982@yahoo.com
CC: teawater@gmail.com, bauerman@br.ibm.com, gdb@sourceware.org,         pedro@codesourcery.com, marc.khouzam@ericsson.com, msnyder@vmware.com,         eliz@gnu.org, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl
In-reply-to: <351926.73043.qm@web36205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (message from 	paawan oza on Sat, 9 May 2009 23:37:20 -0700 (PDT))
Subject: Re: MMX and floating point insn suport for reversible debugging
References:  <351926.73043.qm@web36205.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2

> Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 23:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
> From: paawan oza <paawan1982@yahoo.com>
> 
> Hi Hui,
> 
> I think we need to update and add floating point in following structure
> for st1 to st7.
> 
> enum i386_regnum
> {
>   I386_EAX_REGNUM,		/* %eax */
>   I386_ECX_REGNUM,		/* %ecx */
>   I386_EDX_REGNUM,		/* %edx */
>   I386_EBX_REGNUM,		/* %ebx */
>   I386_ESP_REGNUM,		/* %esp */
>   I386_EBP_REGNUM,		/* %ebp */
>   I386_ESI_REGNUM,		/* %esi */
>   I386_EDI_REGNUM,		/* %edi */
>   I386_EIP_REGNUM,		/* %eip */
>   I386_EFLAGS_REGNUM,		/* %eflags */
>   I386_CS_REGNUM,		/* %cs */
>   I386_SS_REGNUM,		/* %ss */
>   I386_DS_REGNUM,		/* %ds */
>   I386_ES_REGNUM,		/* %es */
>   I386_FS_REGNUM,		/* %fs */
>   I386_GS_REGNUM,		/* %gs */
>   I386_ST0_REGNUM		/* %st(0) */
> };
> 
> what do you say ?

I don't think that should be necessary.