From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30656 invoked by alias); 8 May 2009 20:51:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 30647 invoked by uid 22791); 8 May 2009 20:51:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 May 2009 20:51:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B26C2BACC9; Fri, 8 May 2009 16:51:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Se4jDCWTFhOh; Fri, 8 May 2009 16:51:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7442BACC5; Fri, 8 May 2009 16:51:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9ED92F5900; Fri, 8 May 2009 13:51:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 20:51:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: update on the gdb-7.0 branch/release Message-ID: <20090508205101.GJ675@adacore.com> References: <20090505173540.GB894@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2 Hi Tom, > The pretty-printing patch series is still waiting for a review from an > MI maintainer. In particular I wanted to make sure the new MI > commands are ok. I'll contact Thiago to see if he can take charge of that part. > Phil is still working on the final part of the embedded \0 fix. I > don't know how far out this is. IMO it is not a blocking issue, just > nice to have; the feature is still very useful even with this bug. OK - I will move this issue to the "optional section". > Joel> Given all that, I'm not sure it's wise to try to push for a release > Joel> before the summit. > > Sounds good. OK - at this point, we're defering the branch creation. Pedro also expressed the opinion that we should fix the blocking issues first. I'd like us to be a little bit proactive at fixing the last few issues, so as to take avantage of my availability in June. July and August are going to be crazy for me. So what I'll do is ask for help from some people who are willing to be a point of contact for given issues, and responsible for getting the issue fixed asap. I'll help with review as well as nudging if needed :-). -- Joel