From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-34126-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 13078 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2009 07:19:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 13069 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Apr 2009 07:19:53 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 07:19:45 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n357JYtE023777; 	Sun, 5 Apr 2009 09:19:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n357JYXJ013198; 	Sun, 5 Apr 2009 09:19:34 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 09:16:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200904050719.n357JYXJ013198@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
CC: dje@google.com, gdb@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20090405011134.GA15762@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Sat, 4 Apr 2009 21:11:34 -0400)
Subject: Re: improved thread id reporting
References: <20090404184604.8524C1C759C@localhost> <200904041904.n34J4UXV013513@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <e394668d0904041517x74777a2egc913a9068104209d@mail.gmail.com> <20090405011134.GA15762@caradoc.them.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2

> Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 21:11:34 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 03:17:02PM -0700, Doug Evans wrote:
> > > That said, if it's possible to print them without creating additional
> > > line breaks on an 80-column wide screen, I have no objections.
> > >
> > >> To fix (1) I'd like to simply remove the pthread id from the output.
> > >
> > > I think that's a bad idea.
> > 
> > Even as a user-settable option?
> 
> IMO, yes.  I don't think we need more settable options for details of
> output formatting; 98% or so of users will use the default, so that's
> the part that matters.

Seconded.